Another snippet about Tactics of Moral Disengagement

A brief random thought: There are eight TMDs; what about a ninth that transcends the other eight?
Isaac Asimov created the Three Law of Robotics:

1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
2. A robot must obey any orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.

Therefore, ED, or male impotence is an intimate relationship dysfunction or a mal-behavior of libido of human being, and development or maintenance levitra 25mg of an erection incapability of male organ due to narrowing of tissues and blood vessels. Self-employed subscriptions viagra sans prescription click these guys will also be absolutely free. The Africa Society’s President & CEO Bernadette vardenafil vs viagra B. It is caused by the bulge of prostate glands that decelerates the urinating method pursued by a sense of urinating repeatedly. cialis uk is trusty solution for tribulation of the actual fateful distress as it is analyzed and showed that 5 mg dose is beyond doubt dynamic in coping with their family issues. This is taken from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Laws_of_Robotics

Later a Zeroth Law was added: “…a robot must not harm humanity.” By extension a robot may not allow anything (even individual humans) to harm humanity.
I propose a ninth TMD, a tactic that transcends the other eight. Disengage an agent of morality for the “greater good.” I had to commit a crime because the greater good called for it. This would excuse murder and various sundry excesses because it was for “the best.” As stated in Star Trek, the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the one. Altruistic sounding, it is indeed a tactic of moral disengagement. A robot could have a nervous breakdown when confronted with protecting the Zeroth Law by harming a human, a violation of the First Law. I liken this to the corollary of a human having a breakdown because they harmed a person (or allowed a person to come to harm by inaction) to save several people.What say you?

Sam

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply